Published on Mar 25, 2014
Documentary based on the Missing 411 books by David Paulides.
Related:
*NEW* STRANGE CASES OF MISSING PEOPLE 411 (2015)
From a statistical standpoint, the Bigfoot connection to this topic and
the UFO topic in general is not to be given much credence. However, from
an individual case standpoint, there are a few missing persons cases
that are worth considering and a few more UFO Bigfoot connection cases
that are compelling.
In regard to a Bigfoot kidnapping a person, there are some Native American accounts and surely there would be a few bad seeds out there in the Bigfoot population, just as with with the human population. None of this evidence is nearly conclusive or should be cause for much concern, given the large body of evidence suggesting these creatures are benign.
As to the UFO Bigfoot connection, Stan Gordon has brought forth some interesting cases, which again, statistically can be ignored. However, in the interest of being open minded and non-dismissive of seemingly honest people, I think it's first important to note the large body of evidence supporting an alien source for UFO reality. If you can get on board with that, the next thing to consider, is the oft reported "screen memories," of abductees. These are false memories planted by the alien visitors to obscure the real events that took place during the abduction. This is perhaps more likely than the Bigfoot being abducted too, and certainly more plausible than sightings of a real-life Chewbacca!
In regard to a Bigfoot kidnapping a person, there are some Native American accounts and surely there would be a few bad seeds out there in the Bigfoot population, just as with with the human population. None of this evidence is nearly conclusive or should be cause for much concern, given the large body of evidence suggesting these creatures are benign.
As to the UFO Bigfoot connection, Stan Gordon has brought forth some interesting cases, which again, statistically can be ignored. However, in the interest of being open minded and non-dismissive of seemingly honest people, I think it's first important to note the large body of evidence supporting an alien source for UFO reality. If you can get on board with that, the next thing to consider, is the oft reported "screen memories," of abductees. These are false memories planted by the alien visitors to obscure the real events that took place during the abduction. This is perhaps more likely than the Bigfoot being abducted too, and certainly more plausible than sightings of a real-life Chewbacca!
 |
| http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/wookiees-bf/ |
But of course these missing persons cases are no joke at all. They're
very disturbing. I hope we can all agree on the petition below if noting
else.
The video is good enough to see the arms. It’s no bear. No bear is going to go this fast on two legs for this long.
Why would a bear walk, bipedal style, on snow? I think four legs, for a bear, would be a better strategy for traversing snow.
I do agree, however, that there is no way a bear would traverse the steepness of that snow and ice on two legs. Nor would he choose to go in that direction for any foreseeable reason. He would have gone to the right, or towards the photographer and his buddy.
A Bigfoot, on the other hand, would probably have chosen to go that way, so as to get to the rock slope, where he would have been much more difficult to track with a camera. And here I am, assuming a Bigfoot would see, or know about, cameras.
But I stand by my opinion. In all likelihood, this is a Bigfoot, because I have eliminated that it is a bear or a human.
But the footage ultimately proves nothing, which is familiar territory indeed.