Here's Joe Rogan's take on things:
First and foremost, as Joe Rogan knows, the Patterson-Gimlin film's authenticity is supported by a full Professor of anatomy and anthropology and expert on foot morphology along with locomotion in primates, Dr. Jeff Meldrum.
Furthermore, there is the film analysis of Bill Munns and National Geographic showing the subject's proportions do not match that of any known human. This is coupled with his experimental work trying to build a Bigfoot costume to match the look of the 1967 film, resulting in his co-authorship of a peer-reviewed paper with Meldrum showing that the film subject is consistent with real anatomy and not a Bigfoot suit. Munns studied film and worked for 35 years making monsters for films, museums, and wildlife exhibits, thus is also highly-qualified for the study they have done. Their conclusions cannot be dismissed.
It seems pretty clear to me that Rogan was referencing the below video by Thinker Thunker that deals with the angle of shin rise. Check it out real quick if you haven't seen it.
First and foremost, as Joe Rogan knows, the Patterson-Gimlin film's authenticity is supported by a full Professor of anatomy and anthropology and expert on foot morphology along with locomotion in primates, Dr. Jeff Meldrum.
Furthermore, there is the film analysis of Bill Munns and National Geographic showing the subject's proportions do not match that of any known human. This is coupled with his experimental work trying to build a Bigfoot costume to match the look of the 1967 film, resulting in his co-authorship of a peer-reviewed paper with Meldrum showing that the film subject is consistent with real anatomy and not a Bigfoot suit. Munns studied film and worked for 35 years making monsters for films, museums, and wildlife exhibits, thus is also highly-qualified for the study they have done. Their conclusions cannot be dismissed.
It seems pretty clear to me that Rogan was referencing the below video by Thinker Thunker that deals with the angle of shin rise. Check it out real quick if you haven't seen it.
Here Meldrum talks about the above video and addresses claimed hoaxer Bob Heironimus. He takes on debunking arguments and explains why the 10 footprint casts collected at the site solidifies the case that the figure in
I suspect that if the shin rise of Bob Heironimus were analyzed while he was in the suit attempting a recreation, that Rogan's argument that the odd angle was due to the suit would fall apart. But it doesn't really matter because the recreation was a colossal failure.
Furthermore, Thinker Thunker demonstrates in this video that there are many more inconsistencies in the anatomy of Bob Heironimus vs the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot affectionately known as Patty.
Bob Lazar passes the lie detector test on UFOs by AubreyJames1
Three up close Bigfoot witnesses pass a professionally conducted polygraph test.
Related:
Best Evidence for the Existence of Sasquatch - Forensic, Audio, Video, Photo, Statistical Data
