For two days in late October, 2013, an unseen vocalizer made loud
moaning howls, whoops and wood knocks in the hills near Bruno, West
Virginia. A local resident managed to capture four clips of that
vocalizer with their cell phone, and those clips were quickly shared
with the BFRO. This video spectrogram is an illustrated playback of the
vocals captured in those clips. They are fairly to exceptionally clear,
but head phones are recommended to achieve the best possible listening
experience.
Showing posts with label BFRO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BFRO. Show all posts
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Friday, February 7, 2014
Craig Sulk Possible Trail Cam Photo of Bigfoot - Finding Bigfoot Episode in Upper Michigan
Hunter or Sasquatch? Finding Bigfoot episode in Upper Michigan
MENOMINEE -- On Sunday night Animal Planet aired an episode of Finding Bigfoot titled Super Yooper Sasquatch.
The team traveled outside of Menominee to meet with hunting guide Craig Sulk who owns 80 acres of land. One of Sulk's trail cams captured an unexplainable dark figure.
Is the dark figure a hunter or Sasquatch?
In the episode they also hold a meeting with residents, discovering many claim to have encountered the mysterious creature.
The segment aired at 10 p.m. ET on Sunday evening and 12 and 5 a.m. Monday. - Source: http://www.uppermichiganssource.com/news/story.aspx?id=996300#.UvSK6fvHW31
Undebunking Bigfoot blog commentary:
The photo's owner Craig Sulk argued strongly on the "Super Yooper" Finding Bigfoot episode, that the dark figure in the photograph was not likely a hunter, as the snapshot was a unique sight among the many thousands of trail photos he views each year. Plus he notes, it was taken on his private property, where he contended it's well known around those parts, not to trespass because the area is protected by its gun-toting owners.
The Finding Bigfoot team placed stocky 6'4" James "Bobo" Fay at the same location as the pictured figure, in what investigator Cliff Barackman estimated was within a few feet, five tops, of where the original pictured subject stood. The figure was determined to be very comparable in overall size to Fay, certainly looking to haven't had quite as broad of shoulders as the large Finding Bigfoot investigator did. Bobo's more than average size aside, (a height that would only take Michael Jordan two inches above Fay when side-by-side and certainly Jordan is less wide) it was clear from the comparison photo shot---that Bobo---was just that---Bobo---the human---wearing clothes---and bearing no resemblance to the dark figure's hue.
After the recreation, Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO) founder and Finding Bigfoot investigator, Matt Moneymaker, argued:
 |
| Click to Enlarge |
The team traveled outside of Menominee to meet with hunting guide Craig Sulk who owns 80 acres of land. One of Sulk's trail cams captured an unexplainable dark figure.
Is the dark figure a hunter or Sasquatch?
In the episode they also hold a meeting with residents, discovering many claim to have encountered the mysterious creature.
The segment aired at 10 p.m. ET on Sunday evening and 12 and 5 a.m. Monday. - Source: http://www.uppermichiganssource.com/news/story.aspx?id=996300#.UvSK6fvHW31
Undebunking Bigfoot blog commentary:
The photo's owner Craig Sulk argued strongly on the "Super Yooper" Finding Bigfoot episode, that the dark figure in the photograph was not likely a hunter, as the snapshot was a unique sight among the many thousands of trail photos he views each year. Plus he notes, it was taken on his private property, where he contended it's well known around those parts, not to trespass because the area is protected by its gun-toting owners.
The Finding Bigfoot team placed stocky 6'4" James "Bobo" Fay at the same location as the pictured figure, in what investigator Cliff Barackman estimated was within a few feet, five tops, of where the original pictured subject stood. The figure was determined to be very comparable in overall size to Fay, certainly looking to haven't had quite as broad of shoulders as the large Finding Bigfoot investigator did. Bobo's more than average size aside, (a height that would only take Michael Jordan two inches above Fay when side-by-side and certainly Jordan is less wide) it was clear from the comparison photo shot---that Bobo---was just that---Bobo---the human---wearing clothes---and bearing no resemblance to the dark figure's hue.
After the recreation, Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO) founder and Finding Bigfoot investigator, Matt Moneymaker, argued:
The fact that it's his [Bobo's] size or smaller though, doesn't eliminate the chance that it's a Sasquatch, because they're also that size as well. They grow from being very small to growing up. I think if it had been a person, I think you'd see a difference in the amount of reflectivity, or darkness between the top and the bottom there and you don't. It's as if it's all covered with the same color fur.
Saturday, December 7, 2013
If Patty Was a Costume, Why Can't They Recreate It?
BigfootEvidence.blogspot.com
December 7, 2013
When Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed the Bigfoot walking across the sandbar back 1967, little did they know that their film would be scrutinized by skeptics trying to debunk it. To this day, no one has been able to duplicate the creature they caught on film. The BFRO gives us an example of one colossal failed attempt by a TV network to recreate the "costume":
Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Analysis by Bill Munns and Dr. Jeff Meldrum
Peer-reviewed Science Proving the Patterson-Gimlin Film is not of a Bigfoot Costume but a Novel Primate Species
Debunking Claimed Patterson-Gimlin Film Bigfoot Hoaxer Bob Heironimus
Skeptic Questions Patterson Bigfoot Tracks
December 7, 2013
When Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed the Bigfoot walking across the sandbar back 1967, little did they know that their film would be scrutinized by skeptics trying to debunk it. To this day, no one has been able to duplicate the creature they caught on film. The BFRO gives us an example of one colossal failed attempt by a TV network to recreate the "costume":
Q: Why can't it be done? Why can't anyone accurately recreate the "costume" sued in the Patterson footage?Related Posts:
A: It's not a man in a costume ...
The image on the right is from a scene in an episode of X-Creatures. X-Creatures was a wildlife documentary series made by the BBC's (British Broadcasting Company) Natural History Unit. The episode was filmed around 1995 or later.
In this program the BBC sought to debunk the Patterson footage by recreating the "hoax."
In order to have the most exacting re-enactment possible, the BBC hired the best monster costume designer in Hollywood and even took the costume to the same location where the Patterson incident occurred in Northern California.
How could the BBC have missed the mark so badly with their replica of the Patterson "costume"?
In the Patterson footage, the figure's muscles are flexing noticeably as the figure walks away. To simulate that, the BBC's costume designers in Hollywood had to create a costume that would show the same effect of flexing muscles.
Remote controlled soft-tissue prosthetics were not invented until well after 1967, so they could not have been used in an honest replica of a 1967 costume. The costume had to allow the actor's own muscles to flex the outermost surface of the costume.
Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Analysis by Bill Munns and Dr. Jeff Meldrum
Peer-reviewed Science Proving the Patterson-Gimlin Film is not of a Bigfoot Costume but a Novel Primate Species
Debunking Claimed Patterson-Gimlin Film Bigfoot Hoaxer Bob Heironimus
Skeptic Questions Patterson Bigfoot Tracks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)